Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 08:14:59 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA13456 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:20:39 GMT
    Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:14:59 -0800
    Message-Id: <200202120814.g1C8ExZK025141@mail25.bigmailbox.com>
    X-Authentication-Warning: mail25.bigmailbox.com: www set sender to joedees@addall.com using -f
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.162.88]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    >Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:14:28 -0500
    > Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> memetics@mmu.ac.ukReply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >>> (Colloquially, we refer to this phenomena by saying that
    >>> someone is 'hard to convince', or 'gullible', or 'stubborn'.)
    >
    >The equation of memes with beliefs is one of the prime reasons I
    >advanced to the behavior-only stance. I don't think there is any
    >reasonable proof to show that one's beliefs are what prompts one's
    >behavior. (Hell, we have a second brain that tells us when we're
    >hungry....)
    >
    >But there is reasonable proof, in the form of observations and
    >artefacts, that one's behavior is intended to transfer meaning.
    >
    But where is that meaning stored between receipt and subsequent transference? The same place it may be mutated, i.e. modified: the brain. And the memes-as-behavior stance completely overlooks the efficacy of linguistic coding; 'let's kill' amd 'let's chill' are print and sonically similar, although distinguishable, while the behavior each represents is radically different.
    >
    >- Wade
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 08:36:07 GMT