Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA03520 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:03:04 GMT Message-ID: <001901c1a7e3$664b24e0$1aa6bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <kennethvanoost@myrealbox.com> Subject: Fw: sex and the single meme Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:05:25 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
> > <kennethvanoost@myrealbox.com> Re: sex and the single memeDate: Fri, 25
> > > ><< Their own evolutionary disposition of being pro- life for
> themselves.
> > > >Memes just use you and me, this list, the Net to put forward their
own
> > > >progency. All the ones who are around, in all their forms possible,
are
> > > >the ones who survived and will thrive. The one more than the other,
but
> > > >still the ones dormant are waiting to pop up someday.
> > > >Group or individual, memes don 't care. ' We ' care, but pro- choise
> > > >memes has selected that for us.
> > Joe Dess said,
> > > Yeah, and those anti-abortion memes are peeved about it,
ayy?<snicker!>
> >
> > << Well Joe, in a way they are connected with other plexes as they were.
> > But I see your point and I do understand the hidden meaining behind it,
> > so to speak, but in my understanding, already memesets conjured others
> > to set up defense- mechanisms against the erosion of religious traits
and
> > habits.
> > Pro- choise is choosing pro- life
> > Pro- life is choosing against choise and therefor against life, well set
> > between
> > definitions of what life has supposingly to be.
> >
> > IIRC, the only attacks on abortion- hospitals were done in the US.
> > Holland on the other hand, which has the most advantaged and modern
> > legislition about such things, there were no attacks !
> > The difference lies, IMO, in the history and how religious thoughts are
> > intertwingled with ruling/ laws and thinking.
> > Conformism in any way is choosing against pro- choise and therefor
> > against pro- life.
> >
> > Choosing pro- life and kill for it, well that beats me !
> > Such idiots are the worst kind of fundamentalists, the pope is one them.
> > They haven 't a single clue what is going on in the communities of
today,
> > and moreover they haven 't got the slightest idea what of all kinds of
> pain
> > and suffering they throw upon people !!
> > In a way they are pro- choise if their choise is there to be chosing !
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Kenneth
> >
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 10:46:40 GMT