RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 01:24:23 GMT

  • Next message: Ray Recchia: "Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA19534 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 15 Jan 2002 01:28:52 GMT
    Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:24:23 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201150124.g0F1ONv24339@mail2.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [216.76.250.15]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) For a compelling commentary on how we were misunderstood by our attackers, go to:

    http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_1_why_the_muslims.html

    for Victor Davis Hanson's article "WHY THE MUSLIMS MISJUDGED US".

    > "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu> <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory PerceptionDate: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:29:28 -0500
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >In fairness, the US was put into a most difficult situation on Sept 11,
    >regardless of how our actions before that may have helped create the
    >conditions that led to Sept. 11. We had never imagined that this might
    >happen to us, and our perception that we are liked around the world made it
    >even harder to fathom. Given the level of our impacts globally, Americans
    >generally do not know much about the world outside our borders. Much of
    >official Washington was thrown into what I view as cognitive panic. We just
    >didn't know _how_ to think about Sept 11. We have discussed on this list
    >what the options might have been and their pros and cons, and much as I
    >disagree with what Bush/Rumsfeld/Ashcroft have done, I also can understand
    >how they embarked on that course of action. It was a time when mistakes were
    >easy to make, and with clamour to 'do something (anything) fast' their job
    >was only made harder.
    >
    >Slowly, the Bush administration is beginning to see the inconsistencies and
    >drawbacks of their actions: yesterday, unidentified Whote House 'sources'
    >conceded that the US actions in Afghanistan haven't 'won the war on
    >terrorism.' Next, I hope, will come the recognition that when something
    >fails, doing it harder is not the answer. And then perhaps there will be a
    >willingness to think about terrorism intelligently and to design policies
    >and actions that will defuse it. But I think it will be several months
    >before we get to this point.
    >
    >Also, in the category of the Bush administration calming down and coming to
    >its senses, it has now conceded that missile attacks from 'rogue states' are
    >not the greatest military danger to the US, but that low-grade terrorist
    >attacks (e.g. trucks a la Oklahoma city) are. Some analysts have been
    >arguing this for months (and some years) and it is nice to see some
    >progress.
    >
    >I guess this email is in the way of a plea to those who are critical of US
    >actions (as I am) to understand the immense cognitive blast of Sept 11.
    >Decision-makers here were dazed, and in this conditon mistakes -- even huge
    >ones -- are easy to make. The Bush adminsitration understood little of the
    >US role internationally, and next to nothing about the Middle East. They
    >embarked on a steep learning curve, but felt compelled to take major action
    >before they had had a chance to progress far along it. Now it seems
    >understanding may be beginning to catch up with action. It is a shame that
    >some of these actions may have now foreclosed a range of options that with
    >the growing learning may come to be viewed as advantageous.
    >
    >Sept 11 has a lot to teach us about memetics, and I hope that we continue to
    >remember this when we discuss Sept 11 on this list. There is plenty of room
    >for disagreement on the substance of the Bush actions.
    >
    >Lawrence
    >
    >
    >
    >> I see your point Lawrence, as I'm sure many others on the list do.
    >>
    >> Vincent
    >>
    >> > ----------
    >> > From: Richard Brodie
    >> > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 21:21 PM
    >> > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> > Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    >> >
    >> > I think that's way off base. Bush and other have bent over backwards to
    >> > say
    >> > we are fighting terrorists, not Islam. In any case your
    >> examples are a far
    >> > cry from the intensive anti-Western brainwashing given to some Muslim
    >> > children in their schools.
    >> >
    >> > -----Original Message-----
    >> > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    >> > Of Lawrence DeBivort
    >> > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:28 PM
    >> > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> > Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > Take the instances I listed below. Each of them implies that Christians
    >> > (Americans) have the right to act the way they have in these instances,
    >> > and
    >> > have that right because Muslims are to be hated. The attacks by
    >> the US on
    >> > Arab and Muslims countries, listed below, were carried out outside
    >> > international and US law. At least two instances (Tripoli and
    >> Sudan) were
    >> > found subsequently to be without justification. Muslims are
    >> inferior, goes
    >> > the implicit and at times explicit argument, and so it is acceptable to
    >> > hate
    >> > them.
    >> >
    >> > To put the point more specifically, a US Congressman (from Louisiana, I
    >> > believe?) called Arabs/Muslims a people who wear diapers and
    >> fan belts on
    >> > their heads. Islam is routinely accused of oppressing women (though most
    >> > who
    >> > do so are confusing the Taliban with Islam). And all too many US
    >> > commentators gleefully describe the inferiorities of Islam
    >> while ignoring
    >> > its accomplishments. I attended a local church service, and the pastor
    >> > picked up on this refrain, and said that any society that
    >> harbored within
    >> > it
    >> > those who could carry out Sept. 11 was itself evil (an echo of Bush's
    >> > 'those
    >> > who harbor terrorist' argument). Even Thomas Friedman, who used
    >> to have a
    >> > semi-balanced view of the Middle East, has fallen in with the
    >> anti-Muslim
    >> > views of post-Sept. 11.
    >> >
    >> > All this, unchallenged by any significant body of American political,
    >> > legal
    >> > or moral leaders, conveys to the American people (children or
    >> adults) that
    >> > Muslims are not worthy of fair or legal treatment. Sept 11 proved a
    >> > bonanza
    >> > for those who hate, whether they are Muslims who hate America, or
    >> > Americans
    >> > who hate Muslims. All too many educated Americans fell for it,
    >> as have, I
    >> > would guess, all too many educated Muslims.
    >> >
    >> > Lawrence
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > > -----Original Message-----
    >> > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    >> [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    >> > > Of Richard Brodie
    >> > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:38 PM
    >> > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> > > Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > > No, that wasn't what I was asking. I was asking where Christian
    >> > > children are
    >> > > being taught to hate Muslims.
    >> > >
    >> > > -----Original Message-----
    >> > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    >> [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    >> > > Of Lawrence DeBivort
    >> > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 8:54 AM
    >> > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> > > Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > > Please remember we are asking how Muslim children might get the
    >> > > 'meme' that
    >> > > Christians are out to kill them, in parallel with Chriustian kids
    >> > getting
    >> > > the 'meme' that Muslims are out to kill them...
    >> > >
    >> > > What Christians have done to Muslims recently that might
    >> spread the meme
    >> > > that Christians are out to kill Muslims:
    >> > >
    >> > > - Somalia
    >> > > - Attack on civilian sections of Tripoli
    >> > > - US bombings of Iraq post-Kuwait
    >> > > - Sudan -- Clinton's cruise missiles
    >> > > - Afghanistan - ditto
    >> > >
    >> > > Each of these US actions -- entirely justified in US gov't eyes --
    >> > killed
    >> > > and harmed Muslim civilians.
    >> > >
    >> > > And then we have the highly publicised:
    >> > >
    >> > > - Bush's 'the evil ones' used without specification
    >> > >
    >> > > - Bush's 'crusade' - later retracted by Bush if not by those
    >> who planted
    >> > > this ill-conceived language in his mind), but only after the
    >> > > 'crusade' meme
    >> > > had spread
    >> > >
    >> > > - Afghanistan 'collateral damage' -- this meme, launched by
    >> the DoD and
    >> > > Bush, has been well-exploited to suggest a callous disrgard to
    >> > > the death and
    >> > > maiming of innocents.
    >> > >
    >> > > I won't even go into the two-centuries of colonialism by the
    >> > > Christian West
    >> > > (often and more recently with US participation) that preceded all of
    >> > this.
    >> > > But will, if you inquire ;-D
    >> > >
    >> > > Some will want to argue with us about how some or all of these actions
    >> > are
    >> > > 'justified' but this is not of great interest here: we are
    >> > > talking about the
    >> > > acts, perceptions and language what create and spread memes.
    >> > >
    >> > > Lawrence
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > > > I don't see the parallel. Where is that happening?
    >> > > >
    >> > > > -----Original Message-----
    >> > > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On
    >> > Behalf
    >> > > > Of Lawrence DeBivort
    >> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 7:11 AM
    >> > > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> > > > Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    >> > > >
    >> > > >
    >> > > > In the same way, I suppose, that Muslim parents have to worry about
    >> > > > Christian kids being taught that it is alright to kill Muslims.
    >> > > >
    >> > > >
    >> > > > > <<It's not the memes you have to worry about, it's the people who
    >> > use
    >> > > > > them.>>
    >> > > > >
    >> > > > > So we don't have to worry about Muslim children being taught that
    >> > the
    >> > > > > highest goal in life is to kill themselves in an attack on
    >> > Americans?
    >> > > > >
    >> > > > >
    >> > > > >
    >> > > > > ===============================================================
    >> > > > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> > > > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information
    >> > Transmission
    >> > > > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g.
    >> unsubscribing)
    >> > > > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >> > > >
    >> > > >
    >> > > > ===============================================================
    >> > > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> > > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information
    >> Transmission
    >> > > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> > > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >> > > >
    >> > > >
    >> > > >
    >> > > > ===============================================================
    >> > > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> > > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information
    >> Transmission
    >> > > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> > > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > > ===============================================================
    >> > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >> > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > > ===============================================================
    >> > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >> > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > ===============================================================
    >> > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >> > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > ===============================================================
    >> > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >> > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >> >
    >> >
    >> --
    >> The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    >> charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may
    >> be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated
    >> in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    >> person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    >> and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    >> prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this
    >> message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise
    >> immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    >> for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other
    >> information in this message that do not relate to the official
    >> business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    >> given nor endorsed by it.
    >>
    >>
    >> ===============================================================
    >> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 01:38:27 GMT