Fw: playing at suicide

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 20:18:32 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Fw: CRASH CONTAGION"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA18821 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:16:38 GMT
    Message-ID: <000701c19d38$b84bf680$0da0bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Fw: playing at suicide
    Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:18:32 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi all, untill further notice I will be a lurker, my e- mail problems don 't
    seem to end....

    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: Kenneth Van Oost <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    > > To: memetics <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 4:05 PM
    > > Subject: Re: playing at suicide
    > >
    > >
    > > > Hi Grant,
    > > > I am 4 days behind with my post, so....you wrote,
    > > >
    > > > > For a loner, you seem to communicate with a lot of people.
    > > >
    > > > << You can compare this with having a LAT- relationship. I communicate
    > > > with the people upon this list and others but I stay on my island, as
    > you
    > > > put
    > > > it. Communicating does not mean to spill out all of your gut feelings.
    > > > Don 't get me wrong, I love memetics and I like the discussions, but
    to
    > be
    > > > part of a ' group ' is not my cop of tea. I am, from your point of
    view,
    > > and
    > > > I understand I am, but it is not with my content.
    > > >
    > > > But most of the kids I grew up with were not really
    > > > > indoctrinated. They just went along with what their parents were
    > doing
    > > > > because that's what they felt comfortable with. The tribal part
    came
    > > with
    > > > > the peers they decided to hang around with.
    > > >
    > > > << Do you think so !? Are you pretty sure !? You say it in the above,
    > not
    > > > really indoctinated, but they followed just their parents !? What is
    the
    > > > difference !? Where is your choise in this !? Indoctrination can take
    > many
    > > > forms.
    > > > Did your parents or your grandmother never said not to hang out with
    > cer-
    > > > tain kind of guys and people !? You can call it, protection if you
    like,
    > > but
    > > > deep within you are indoctrinated with all kind of belief- systems.
    You
    > > can
    > > > not escape it ! Is the notion not to have sex before marriage a kind
    of
    > > in-
    > > > doctrination or a way of protecting you against the hazzards of life
    !?
    > > >
    > > > And maybe is it very hard to believe but I do not have a circle of
    > > friends,
    > > > or a particular friend for that matter. If you call memetics a group
    > with
    > > a
    > > > simular view on evolution than you can call us, me part of a '
    > religion',
    > > I
    > > > have
    > > > a particular attitude, it was my choise, but then again, it was '
    > forced'
    > > > upon
    > > > me due to certain cicumstances. This list does have a positive
    attitude
    > > upon
    > > > me, I learn a lot, I meet interesting people, but that is not, IMO, as
    > > much
    > > > as a religious choise ! Please !
    > > >
    > > > I ain 't gonna say that your point of view is due to the ways where
    into
    > > you
    > > > were raised, as much as me, but the difference lies in the way you and
    I
    > > see
    > > > the world around us. You were, that can be found in your post, always
    > > > surrounded with other people, moreover, you deliberate seeked out, or
    > they
    > > > searched for you, other guys, to hang out with. I did not !
    > > > You were ' indoctrinated ' by the notion of being part of some peer-
    > > group,
    > > > I was not, I am an individual, due like I said by cicumstances beyond
    my
    > > > control.
    > > > The way by which you see how members of societies act is just due to
    > that
    > > > fact, you think in the ' group ' form, I am more individualistic.
    > > >
    > > > Everybody, picked out peers who dare to rebel, no matter how you de-
    > > > terminate that term. I did too, but after a while I saw the
    > imcompleteness
    > > > of such a group and lost interest, still.
    > > > Religion is not only the practical side of the matter, though.
    > > > I live in Belgium, a very old catholic region of the world. Our laws,
    > our
    > > > rules, behavior, ethics, manners, attitudes, language are packed with
    > > > christian dispositions. It is not that I did not attend a catholic
    > school
    > > > that
    > > > I wasn 't indoctrinated with their garbage. We, your daughter, you and
    I
    > > > pick up memes, unconsciously and live by their rules.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Regards,
    > > >
    > > > Kenneth
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 14 2002 - 20:23:40 GMT