the hook

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 02:52:26 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: A Question for Wade" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA20343 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 29 Nov 2001 02:57:27 GMT
Subject: the hook
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:52:26 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20011129025226.AAA14843@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.33]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    I think my time is up, debate-wise, here from the
    only-artefacts-are-memes stance. Time to sit down and soak up much more
    from the audience. I didn't have a predilection for either side, nor any
    emotional attachment, nor any belief one way or the other. I am a
    skeptic, and look for balance from all sides. I wasn't seeing much of a
    balance for the Gatherer position, so I jumped up on that side of the
    seesaw. I liked the view. (But, I liked the view from the memes in the
    mind side, too, and, from the fulcrum in the middle, where things quantum
    tunnel from one side to the other.)

    Besides, in any debate, there's supposed to be a team.

    All the world's a stage.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 29 2001 - 03:09:01 GMT