Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA07586 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 24 Nov 2001 00:57:14 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Philip A.E. Jonkers" <phae@uclink.berkeley.edu> Organization: UC Berkeley To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: Verbal memeticism Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:56:42 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20011124003707.AAA29680@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.50]> In-Reply-To: <20011124003707.AAA29680@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.50]> Message-Id: <0111231556420A.06012@storm.berkeley.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Friday 23 November 2001 04:37 pm, you wrote:
> Hi Joe E. Dees -
>
> >Not only is everything verbal memetic, but everything
> >technological possesses a memetic component, as well.
>
> Is this ubiquity not a problem?
Yes, it is not a problem...
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 24 2001 - 01:03:14 GMT