Re: Verbal memeticism

From: Philip A.E. Jonkers (phae@uclink.berkeley.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 23 2001 - 23:56:42 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: Verbal memeticism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA07586 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 24 Nov 2001 00:57:14 GMT
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    From: "Philip A.E. Jonkers" <phae@uclink.berkeley.edu>
    Organization: UC Berkeley
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Verbal memeticism
    Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:56:42 -0800
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
    References: <20011124003707.AAA29680@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.50]>
    In-Reply-To: <20011124003707.AAA29680@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.50]>
    Message-Id: <0111231556420A.06012@storm.berkeley.edu>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Friday 23 November 2001 04:37 pm, you wrote:
    > Hi Joe E. Dees -
    >
    > >Not only is everything verbal memetic, but everything
    > >technological possesses a memetic component, as well.
    >
    > Is this ubiquity not a problem?

    Yes, it is not a problem...

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 24 2001 - 01:03:14 GMT