Re: Verbal memeticism

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2001 - 00:37:12 GMT

  • Next message: Philip A.E. Jonkers: "Re: Verbal memeticism" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA07552 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 24 Nov 2001 00:42:09 GMT
Subject: Re: Verbal memeticism
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:37:12 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20011124003707.AAA29680@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.50]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Joe E. Dees -

    >Not only is everything verbal memetic, but everything
    >technological possesses a memetic component, as well.

    Is this ubiquity not a problem?

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 24 2001 - 00:48:00 GMT