Re: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sat Sep 22 2001 - 21:08:54 BST

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: Dawkins was right all along"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA03196 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:33:58 +0100
    Message-ID: <002d01c143a2$7cc17260$36a2bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMACEHKCGAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Subject: Re: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)
    Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:08:54 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Lawrence DeBivort <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 7:02 PM
    Subject: RE: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)

    > Past Septembers have seen 'memorable' black days in the Arab and Muslim
    > worlds, including, IIRC, the attacks on the Palestinian camps in Lebanon.
    I
    > wonder if on the anniversary of those events there might be some new
    > terrorist acts?
    >
    > To clarify, by 'pointless' I do not mean that we won't be the targets of
    > terrorist acts again, but that the security measures now being taken won't
    > stop them, if they are undertaken. By 'extravagant' I mean that the
    measures
    > are taking a big toll on people (airports, airport 'security', roads,
    > businesses in 'vulnerable' locations, etc.) and making it harder for
    people
    > psychologically to settle back into normal lives--without a real pay-off
    in
    > deterrence of terrorist activity. A friend who manages a mid-size airport
    > told me that they, along with all other airports, are engaging in all
    sorts
    > of FAA-mandated security measures, even though they all know it is a sham
    > and does not improve real security against real threats. He singled out
    the
    > questioning and searching of passengers in this regard.

    Hi Lawrence,

    Terrorist activity will continue even after the improved security measures.
    Terrorists, and they already has been patient, will wait until everybody
    is off gard again. They are not stupid.
    One of the suspects, in jail right now in Belgium, was a professional
    football ( soccer) player, applauded every week by thousands of his
    " enemies ". Those guys lives ordinary lives, no fuss.
    They could be everybody's neighbour....

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 23:55:31 BST