Re: Dawkins was right all along

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 24 2001 - 01:26:59 BST

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: Dawkins was right all along"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA03485 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:34:03 +0100
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.151]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along
    Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 20:26:59 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F227e2U8QVjp3b6uIU100003de6@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2001 00:27:00.0109 (UTC) FILETIME=[A02843D0:01C1448F]
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along
    >Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:50:46 -0400
    >
    >Hi Bill Spight -
    >
    > >Please show how learning is, by definition, necessary for belief, using
    > >the dictionary definition.
    >
    >A belief is "Something believed or accepted as true, especially a
    >particular tenet or a body of tenets accepted by a group of persons."
    >
    >I fail to see how believing tenets accepted by a group of persons is not
    >a learned behavior.
    >
    >But, really, semantics and definitions aside, religion _is_ a learned
    >behavior. Period. It is not innate. Acting as the agent of a religion is
    >a learned behavior. Period. It is not innate. Accepting rewards in an
    >afterlife is a belief, and beliefs are tenets held _without evidence_.
    >Learned tenets.
    >
    >Explain how one gets tales of an afterlife without being taught same.
    >
    >
    There could be an innate or heritable underbelly to the generation of
    religious belief, whether adaptive or non-adaptive. OTOH, there might not be
    such an innate bias. I guess it depends on whether there's a "God module" or
    not.

    Any adaptiveness to such a bias would not justify religion in itself, a
    distinction averting a plunge into the sticky realm of the so called
    naturalistic fallacy.

    Aside from a putative predisposing underbelly, the beliefs in religions are
    probably learned. The beliefs themselves, as ideas, could not be inherited
    in the genetic sense.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 01:38:59 BST