RE: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2001 - 18:02:13 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Why crash hijacked planes after we already *gave* them perfectly good rocket launchers?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA13045 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:04:07 +0100
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)
    Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 13:02:13 -0400
    Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMACEHKCGAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    In-Reply-To: <20010921163530.AAA7389@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Past Septembers have seen 'memorable' black days in the Arab and Muslim
    worlds, including, IIRC, the attacks on the Palestinian camps in Lebanon. I
    wonder if on the anniversary of those events there might be some new
    terrorist acts?

    To clarify, by 'pointless' I do not mean that we won't be the targets of
    terrorist acts again, but that the security measures now being taken won't
    stop them, if they are undertaken. By 'extravagant' I mean that the measures
    are taking a big toll on people (airports, airport 'security', roads,
    businesses in 'vulnerable' locations, etc.) and making it harder for people
    psychologically to settle back into normal lives--without a real pay-off in
    deterrence of terrorist activity. A friend who manages a mid-size airport
    told me that they, along with all other airports, are engaging in all sorts
    of FAA-mandated security measures, even though they all know it is a sham
    and does not improve real security against real threats. He singled out the
    questioning and searching of passengers in this regard.

    I do hope I don't live to eat my words...I suppose it is the uncertainty of
    it all that justifies the extravagance.

    Lawrence

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
    > Wade T.Smith
    > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:35 PM
    > To: memetics list
    > Subject: RE: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)
    >
    >
    > On 09/21/01 09:45, Lawrence DeBivort said this-
    >
    > >Now the country faces many needs, including undoing the extravagant and
    > >pointless 'heightened security measures' that were implemented.
    >
    > Boston has been told it is 'on the list' for near-future attacks. Two Bin
    > Ladens were escorted out of their downtown apartments to a chartered
    > plane waiting for them at the airport. The mayor and the governor have
    > both received visits from officials.
    >
    > The skies are still mostly quiet.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 21 2001 - 18:09:06 BST