Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA26918 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 29 May 2001 07:24:29 +0100 Subject: RE: Or the oversight of the instant response? Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 02:20:20 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010529062020.AAA12393@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.8]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Angela -
>the
>other obvious example, not to be sexist, being women and shoe shops?
Well, if you have one, you needs must have the other....
>Query: is spectator sport a
>memetic successor to Roman bread and circuses?
It is _all_ and ever has been, spectator sports. There are those who
would insist that baseball requires a higher class of observation, and
thus observer, than gladiator sports like football or boxing or the
original gladiators cum lions and tigers and bears, but, really, any
stadia will do.
And not much has changed- there were box seats and hot and cold running
waitresses for the executive set back in Rome, too. Even air conditioning
and a roof, from recent studies of the Coliseum. Culture happens.
But, speaking memetically and contemporarily about spectator sports,
'Rollerball' is being remade, even as we speak, albeit sans John Houseman
or Ralph Richardson.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 29 2001 - 07:28:12 BST