Re: Information

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat May 12 2001 - 03:17:18 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Information"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA10770 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 12 May 2001 03:15:10 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 21:17:18 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Information
    Message-ID: <3AFC56DE.2154.121A2FA@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010509102633.B480@ii01.org>
    References: <3AF7FF80.106.3BDEF5@localhost>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 02:15:28PM -0500
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 9 May 2001, at 10:26, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 02:15:28PM -0500, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > > > > Bingo! J is inaccessible, like Kant's noumenon or Sartre's
    > en-soi > or Husserl's ding an sich; if it were accessible, it would be
    > I. It is > the information that would be available if Heisenbergian
    > restrictions > did not apply - but they do; it is therefore an
    > abstract ideal > construct, having no observable or testable real,
    > concrete, > empirical referent. Thus, it is very strange for someone
    > to claim to > be able to calculate the disparity between J and I, for
    > that is quite > simply claiming to be able to calculate the disparity
    > between the > knowable and the unknowable.
    >
    > Can you explain how, using "the unknowable", Frieden and colleagues
    > were able to derive physical laws to the satisfaction of physics
    > journal reviewers?
    >
    > Personally, I suspect that what's critical is *amounts* of
    > information, so they only need a single figure for J in any particular
    > system, the number of bits.
    >
    > You have Frieden's book, don't you, Joe? Can you confirm that?
    >
    friedan does not need to calculate the incalculable in order to
    compare it with the calculable; he merely needs to derive the
    parameters of the different fuzzinesses, beneath which
    heisenbergian constraints will not allow is to fix measurement more
    precisely; it is from the specific characters of these fuzzinesses,
    and the ruiles governing their mathematical description, that
    particular laws emerge. And yes, I own the book.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 12 2001 - 03:20:14 BST