Re: Information

From: Robin Faichney (robin@ii01.org)
Date: Mon May 14 2001 - 19:45:52 BST

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Information"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA16999 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 14 May 2001 19:51:10 +0100
    Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:45:52 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Information
    Message-ID: <20010514194552.B534@ii01.org>
    References: <3AF7FF80.106.3BDEF5@localhost>; <20010509102633.B480@ii01.org> <3AFC56DE.2154.121A2FA@localhost>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <3AFC56DE.2154.121A2FA@localhost>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:17:18PM -0500
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@ii01.org>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:17:18PM -0500, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > On 9 May 2001, at 10:26, Robin Faichney wrote:
    >
    > > Can you explain how, using "the unknowable", Frieden and colleagues
    > > were able to derive physical laws to the satisfaction of physics
    > > journal reviewers?
    > >
    > > Personally, I suspect that what's critical is *amounts* of
    > > information, so they only need a single figure for J in any particular
    > > system, the number of bits.
    > >
    > > You have Frieden's book, don't you, Joe? Can you confirm that?
    > >
    > friedan does not need to calculate the incalculable in order to
    > compare it with the calculable; he merely needs to derive the
    > parameters of the different fuzzinesses, beneath which
    > heisenbergian constraints will not allow is to fix measurement more
    > precisely; it is from the specific characters of these fuzzinesses,
    > and the ruiles governing their mathematical description, that
    > particular laws emerge. And yes, I own the book.

    Maybe you need to look at it again, then, in order to answer the simple
    question: is J the *amount* of "intrinsic" information or not?

    (Please note the quote marks there, and try not to throw another wobbly.)

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 14 2001 - 19:54:49 BST