Re: Information

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue May 08 2001 - 20:29:32 BST

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Information"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA03060 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 8 May 2001 20:26:55 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 14:29:32 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Information
    Message-ID: <3AF802CC.28834.48BE56@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010505133340.B1058@ii01.org>
    References: <3AF2D280.1640.7E145E@localhost>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:02:08PM -0500
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 5 May 2001, at 13:33, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:02:08PM -0500, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > > On 3 May 2001, at 18:33, Robin Faichney wrote: > > > More generally,
    > in thermodynamics, material structure is considered as > >
    > information, and is inversely proportional to entropy. If you want to
    > > > argue with that, I suggest you seek out an appropriate forum --
    > but I > > doubt you'll convince many physicists to adopt your view. >
    > > > Except the physicist John A. Wheeler, who is quoted approvingly >
    > at both the beginning and the end of Friedan's book. I repeat the >
    > quote for your benefit: > > All things physical are
    > information-theoretic in origin and this is > a participatory
    > universe...Observer participation gives rise to > information, and
    > information gives rise to physics. > > Apparently, Friedan, Wheeler
    > and Heisenberg, as physicists, all > understood the phenomenological
    > lesson you, as a wannabe > philosopher, have yet to learn.
    >
    > I'm sorry, but that quote seems to me to support my position. Perhaps
    > you'd be good enough to explain?
    >
    The part about observer participation giving rise to information
    (which in turn gives rise to physics) is as clear as a bell; in the
    absence of observer participation, one cannot claim information, for
    there is no participating observer for it to INFORM. As for all things
    physical being information-theoretic in origin, that's information-
    theoretic FOR US, who formulate theories from the information we,
    as participant observers, apprehend, via perception, from our
    perspectives upon the physical and participatory universe we
    inhabit.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 08 2001 - 20:30:35 BST