Re: Information

From: Robin Faichney (robin@ii01.org)
Date: Sat May 05 2001 - 13:30:35 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Information"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA27030 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 5 May 2001 23:46:46 +0100
    Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 13:30:35 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Information
    Message-ID: <20010505133035.A1058@ii01.org>
    References: <3AF0908F.757.FB2CC2@localhost>; <20010503193657.A592@ii01.org> <3AF2CDEF.20100.6C3DAE@localhost>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <3AF2CDEF.20100.6C3DAE@localhost>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Fri, May 04, 2001 at 03:42:39PM -0500
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@ii01.org>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 03:42:39PM -0500, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > On 3 May 2001, at 19:36, Robin Faichney wrote:
    >
    > > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:56:15PM -0500, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > >
    > > > We cannot fall into the behaviorist trap of
    > > > dismissing the unobserved as nonexistent...
    > >
    > > You seem very happy to do just that regarding information.
    > >
    > But information is different, in that unless it INFORMs someone,
    > that is, unless it is observed, it is not INFORMation, but pattern or
    > configuration. It cannot possess significance or meaning unless it
    > signifies or means something to someone. I have no doubt that
    > unobserved pattern, structure and/or configuration indeed exists,
    > but as it is unobserved, no one is INFORMed concerning its
    > particularities, thus there is no INFORMing, hence no
    > INFORMation. The systematically configured marks in books only
    > become information when someone is writing or reading them.

    So what do you think of the use of "information" in communication theory?
    Is that all wrong too? Are you the only one that's in step?

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 05 2001 - 23:58:58 BST