Re: Determinism

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Thu Apr 05 2001 - 15:07:51 BST

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: never determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA05018 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:37:45 +0100
    Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:07:51 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Message-ID: <20010405150751.C575@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20010404112028.C679@reborntechnology.co.uk> <00b701c0bcf4$e83c9360$5eaefea9@rcn.com> <20010404152036.C675@reborntechnology.co.uk> <011301c0bd1a$068431a0$5eaefea9@rcn.com> <20010404164452.A551@reborntechnology.co.uk> <013401c0bd23$347ebcc0$5eaefea9@rcn.com> <20010404184930.A1269@reborntechnology.co.uk> <013f01c0bd6b$21682e80$5eaefea9@rcn.com> <20010405083612.A986@reborntechnology.co.uk> <018901c0bda5$90f06120$5eaefea9@rcn.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <018901c0bda5$90f06120$5eaefea9@rcn.com>; from agassi@erols.com on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:53:56AM -0400
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:53:56AM -0400, Aaron Agassi wrote:
    >
    > > > > > > > > > > > Free choices being subjective, then, do not contradict
    > with
    > > > > > > > objective
    > > > > > > > > > > > determinism.
    > > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > > You got it!
    > > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > > Now all we have to do is get it clear that subjectivity is
    > not
    > > > > > > > generally
    > > > > > > > > > > inferior (or superior) to objectivity.
    > > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > What ever are you talking about?
    > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > Again, I have to spell it out: despite being subjective,
    > freedom
    > > > is
    > > > > > just
    > > > > > > > > as real as -- something real.
    > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Where does superiority or inferiority come into it?
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Illusions are generally considered inferior to real phenomena.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > I don't understand.
    > > > >
    > > > > Don't you prefer reality over dealing with illusions?
    > > > >
    > > > Preference is another question.
    > >
    > > I don't think it's entirely rational either, but you'll find there's
    > > quite a widespread preference for objectivity over subjectivity.
    > >
    > The entire point being, that freedom, in all of it's subjectivity, may be
    > deemed not illusory, as such, but, rather, only relative to it's frame of
    > reference, as it where.

    As it where? Sorry, yes. As you were.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 05 2001 - 15:46:14 BST