Re: Determinism

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu Apr 05 2001 - 03:18:47 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA02731 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Apr 2001 08:19:57 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:18:47 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Message-ID: <3ACB8FB7.8569.2BFB4A@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <012601c0bd22$e32ba540$5eaefea9@rcn.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 4 Apr 2001, at 12:18, Aaron Agassi wrote:

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Vincent Campbell" <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    > To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:41 AM
    > Subject: RE: Determinism
    >
    >
    > > <No, just the opposite:
    > >
    > > > The less you know, the more options may seem viable. But the more
    > > > one knows, the more choices are eliminated, because it becomes
    > > > clear that they
    > would
    > > > not achieve the desired outcome. if one had perfect knowledge,
    > > > there
    > would
    > > > always be only one optimum decision in ever circumstance. No range
    > > > of choice.>
    > > >
    > > Ah, I see, I understand. But doesn't that have a normative
    > > assumption, that with perfect knowledge one would be compelled to
    > > make the optimum decision? Why should one make this assumption?
    > > Surely one is not compelled to do what is optimum- or is that just a
    > > feature of the "real world" impossibility of perfect knowledge (i.e.
    > > no-one behaves that way because no-one has perfect knowledge)?
    > >
    > > Besides, I don't much like this designation of freedom as lack of
    > > knowledge, which is essentially what's being stated. Perhaps I'm
    > > thinking too much about the concept in terms of its usage in
    > > political philosophy.
    > >
    > > Vincent
    > >
    > >
    > I confess that I find your implication of freedom as sheer perversity
    > flying in the face of better judgement, the more disturbing. And I may
    > even be forced to concede the possibility. But what kind of freedom is
    > that? Is there nothing better?
    >
    There might be more than one best way to skin a cat.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 05 2001 - 08:31:48 BST