Re: Determinism

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:16:15 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA28011 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:28:42 +0100
    Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:16:15 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Message-ID: <20010404111615.B679@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <3AC904E5.10167.246146@localhost> <3AC9A569.258C00E9@bioinf.man.ac.uk> <20010403122328.A661@reborntechnology.co.uk> <3AC9D88B.47D228B1@bioinf.man.ac.uk> <20010403214234.A699@reborntechnology.co.uk> <005c01c0bc8e$bc8e6380$5eaefea9@rcn.com> <20010404090223.A10999@reborntechnology.co.uk> <3ACAECEF.D15F5D69@bioinf.man.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <3ACAECEF.D15F5D69@bioinf.man.ac.uk>; from Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:44:15AM +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:44:15AM +0100, Chris Taylor wrote:
    > > > > Prove it.
    > > >
    > > > Ocam's Razor:
    > > > In explanation, don't multiply entities unnecessarily. Causality is
    > > > sufficient. The burden of evidentiary support rests upon the positive. It's
    > > > not for anyone else to prove that there ISN'T an unnecessary redundant
    > > > additional unknown factor aside from causality.
    > >
    > > "An unnecessary redundant additional unknown factor" is redundant (as
    > > well as incoherent). I'm only suggesting that perhaps some events don't
    > > have a cause. In this case, "there is nothing which happens that does
    > > not have a cause" is the positive upon which the burden of evidentiary
    > > support rests.
    >
    > This is science not law - that means (strictly speaking) you have to
    > disprove my assertion (my surmise of my general experience of the
    > world).

    Why?

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:34:43 BST