Re: Determinism

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:20:28 BST

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA28016 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:28:44 +0100
    Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:20:28 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Message-ID: <20010404112028.C679@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <3AC904E5.10167.246146@localhost> <3AC9A569.258C00E9@bioinf.man.ac.uk> <20010403122328.A661@reborntechnology.co.uk> <001c01c0bc47$b61e1aa0$5eaefea9@rcn.com> <20010403214415.B699@reborntechnology.co.uk> <004d01c0bc87$83e4f140$5eaefea9@rcn.com> <20010404091412.B10999@reborntechnology.co.uk> <008e01c0bce3$3a40d7a0$5eaefea9@rcn.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <008e01c0bce3$3a40d7a0$5eaefea9@rcn.com>; from agassi@erols.com on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:42:48AM -0400
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:42:48AM -0400, Aaron Agassi wrote:
    >
    > > > > Uncertainty is both necessary and sufficient for freedom.
    > > > >
    > > > Just what is Uncertainty?
    > >
    > > Uncertainty is the state of not knowing. (Don't you have a dictionary,
    > > Aaron?)
    >
    > I suspect that you actually do know what I am asking.
    >
    > By uncertainty, then, you mean measurement uncertainty, and not
    > Indeterminacy, an entirely different (and dubvious) concept.

    By uncertainty I mean uncertainty.

    > >Perfect knowledge negates freedom, but perfect knowledge is
    > > acheivable neither in practice nor in theory, so freedom is not negated.
    > >
    > > As long as people try to understand freedom as a physical phenomenon,
    > > confusion will reign.
    > >
    >
    > Free choices being subjective, then, do not contradict with objective
    > determinism.

    You got it!

    Now all we have to do is get it clear that subjectivity is not generally
    inferior (or superior) to objectivity.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:38:01 BST