Re: taboos

From: Douglas Brooker (dbrooker@clara.co.uk)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 19:39:27 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: taboos"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA09939 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:55:21 +0100
    Message-ID: <3AC4D2DF.F40E1815@clara.co.uk>
    Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:39:27 +0100
    From: Douglas Brooker <dbrooker@clara.co.uk>
    Organization: University of London
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: taboos
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D3C@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Vincent Campbell wrote:

    > Where many other taboos come from, and what makes some change widely over
    > time (e.g. attitudes over homosexuality) is what Kenneth and I were
    > discussing a while ago, so I won't repeat myself (well, any more than I have
    > already, no doubt too much for some).

    One aspect of this might be new: the distinction between public morality and
    private morality and the social contradictions it keeps in abeyance. Most of
    the examples I've seen on the list of specific collective behaviour relate to
    public events. What about changing private behaviour and its relation to public
    morality? Everyone knows changes in the voting habits of a small percentage of
    people can swing elections. I've wondered if the change of ethos from the 70's
    to the harder edged 80's in North America related to the fact that a critical
    mass of people quit smoking and the effects filtered through to society?

    There are many places in the world, perhaps outside of the USA, where in terms
    of public morality, homosexuality is a serious criminal offence; privately,
    however, it's so common that using the word 'normal' is appropriate - so long as
    it's private. Everybody does it, (men at least) in some places, no one talks
    about it, but everybody (males and females) knows (??) about it.

    The public-private discourse distinction has become much less distinct, since
    the 60's, in the US and elsewhere...but not everywhere.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 19:58:44 BST