RE: taboos

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 16:55:24 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: taboos" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA09026 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:27:45 +0100
From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: taboos
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:55:24 -0500
Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAEENKCBAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
In-Reply-To: <E14j0vU-000GsE-00@gaea>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Doug Brooker:
    > Why would advertisers want to use something that all clinical trials
    shows doesn't work and is also likely to get the advertiser and agency
    into deep merde? Did you see see the 'rat'?

    LdB:
    I would be surprised if, well done, subliminal advertising doesn't work.
    Does anyone have references on studies that suggest that it does/doesn't?

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 17:30:25 BST