Re: taboos

From: Douglas Brooker (dbrooker@clara.co.uk)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 16:35:00 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: taboos"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA08709 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:38:42 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: taboos
    X-Remote_Addr: 195.195.65.222
    Message-Id: <E14j0vU-000GsE-00@gaea>
    From: Douglas Brooker <dbrooker@clara.co.uk>
    Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:35:00 +0100
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > On 03/30/01 08:55, Douglas Brooker said this-
    >
    > >why would subliminal advertising be so controversial? The ad-maker
    is
    > >aware of the content, the perceiver isn't. (?)
    >
    > Subliminal advertising is controversial by virtue of it's being a
    figment
    > of some people's imagination, and having no verifiable evidence for
    its
    > existence.
    >
    > The admaker is only aware of having done something he or she thinks
    might
    > make a difference, but, in all clinical forays, no difference has
    been
    > found.

    Why would advertisers want to use something that all clinical trials
    shows doesn't work and is also likely to get the advertiser and agency
    into deep merde? Did you see see the 'rat'?

    The controversy about subliminal advertising isn't about whether it
    works or not, it's about the intent of the advertiser and the
    vulnerability or fears of those who see or hear the ad that their free
    will will be subverted.

    > Subliminal advertising is an urban myth.

    You've acknowledged subliminal advertising exists, so the myth would
    seem to be only whether it can achieve the results intended. The myth
    is that it can, the studies (facts, perhaps) are that it can't. I
    take your word on the studies.

    What are the messages being communicated in ads for products like '
    Charmin' the ultra soft toilet paper? "Don't squeeze the Charmin" It'
    s about something most see a taboo. Sorry this example is so dated but
    I haven't watched tv in a long time.

    -- 
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 16:42:32 BST