Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 21 2001 - 08:44:48 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: fitness and stability"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA18161 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:23:22 GMT
    Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:44:48 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Message-ID: <20010221084448.A11074@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <F14895K7aI4z93XAg0p00006d0d@hotmail.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <F14895K7aI4z93XAg0p00006d0d@hotmail.com>; from ecphoric@hotmail.com on Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:33:06PM -0500
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:33:06PM -0500, Scott Chase wrote:
    >
    > >In fact, if we look only at genes and memes, then fitness does mean
    > >survivability, which does mean stability. A fit gene is simply one
    > >that survives, which requires stability in the relevant environment.
    > >The difference between living and non-living entities is that, with life,
    > >we have stable items of information, as opposed to mere matter.
    > >
    > Could a gene make do with mere survival or would it need to find a way to
    > ensure that copies of itself are made and are passed onward down the line?

    That's a false dichotomy. According to latest thinking, you and I
    share about 99.9% of our genes. That's not because we're physically
    connected, like Siamese twins (sorry, forget the modern terminology),
    but because genes are items of information: no matter how many copies
    of one exist, it remains one gene, and there is no distinction to be
    drawn between "mere survival" and "survival by reproduction".

    > Maybe survival and reproduction should be viewed as complementary.

    In memetics and genetics they're the same thing.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:25:38 GMT