Re: Lamarkism (sic) and memetics

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 08:35:51 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Labels for memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA28912 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:21:58 GMT
    Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:35:51 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Lamarkism (sic) and memetics
    Message-ID: <20010209083551.A1157@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <F1159lHiu3fQtYdVzDp00001257@hotmail.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <F1159lHiu3fQtYdVzDp00001257@hotmail.com>; from ecphoric@hotmail.com on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:56:49PM -0500
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:56:49PM -0500, Scott Chase wrote:
    > >
    > >Seems to me one of the greatest benefits of memetics is that it offers
    > >a NON-Lamarkian explanation of the fact that acquired human behavioural
    > >traits often appear to be inherited.
    > >
    > >
    > The issue of Lamarckism aside, does "memetics" offer a convincing
    > explanation? Is it supportable? Is it merely the pouring of old wine into
    > new plastic bottles?

    Memetics, like genetics before it (and especially Dawkinsian
    neo-Darwinism) offers a paradigm shift, a profound change in perspective.
    Ideas, like organisms, still thrive or fail to do so for particular
    reasons that can be, and in some cases are better, discussed in
    non-genetic and non-memetic terms. This is where physiology, psychology,
    etc come into the picture. Memetics offers no new reasons for ideas
    etc to survive or to disappear, it just offers an extremely elegant
    way to think about the process in general terms, at an abstract level.
    In a sense, it is "merely" a repackaging, but just like bottling wine,
    it can be extremely useful. Anyone think we shouldn't bottle wine?

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 09 2001 - 09:29:13 GMT