Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 19:09:50 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Busy-ness"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA17508 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:06:17 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:09:50 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Message-ID: <3A7FF79E.32500.380DBC5@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <3A803A7F.1FCB3AF3@pacbell.net>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 6 Feb 2001, at 9:55, Bill Spight wrote:

    > Dear Able,
    >
    > > I would say that the essential difference between Darwinian
    > > evolution
    > > and the evolution of memes is that in Genetic evolution there is no
    > > conscious choice by the participating players (the subjects who are
    > > evolving) while there is definitely conscious or subconscious
    > > involved choosing whether a meme is imitated or for that matter
    > > whether a new meme is created, sort of Lamarckian so to say.
    >
    > But in memetic evolution the evolving entities (memes) do not engage
    > in conscious or subconscious choice, either. Human beings make choices
    > that affect the survivability and replicability of memes. The role of
    > memes in those choices is an interesting question, but the memes
    > themselves do not exercise choice.
    >
    People choose a lot of the memes they choose to accept and
    reject for their own benefit, and none for the memes' benefit.
    Human culture is not running a meme charity. Some memes fly in
    under the radar, and are inadvertently or subliminally absorbed.
    But we make the comprehensive absorption of valued others
    among our most cherished goals, as we do the continual rejection
    of despised memes. We imperfectly yet pretty well can filter the
    virulents from the symbionts once we have a modicum of
    experience in the world and learn the Bad Tricks (with apologies to
    Daniel Dennett), which is why so many memeplexes, particularly
    religious, political, racial, and gender biases and prejudices, have
    evolved subcomponents which influence parents to infect their kids
    before resistance can set in.
    >
    > I agree that memetic evolution is Lamarckian, because environmental
    > changes are passed on by imitation. In Dawinian evolution the germ
    > line is protected from the environment (except for cosmic rays and
    > such) in a way that is not the case with memes.
    >
    > Best regards,
    >
    > Bill
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 19:08:15 GMT