RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Chris Lofting (ddiamond@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 10:48:30 GMT

  • Next message: Dr Able Lawrence: "Re: Gemetica and the creation of 'gemes'."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA12434 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:39:29 GMT
    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:48:30 +1100
    Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIEEIDCNAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    In-reply-to: <20010206091236.B557@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Robin,

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Robin Faichney
    > Sent: Tuesday, 6 February 2001 8:13
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    >
    >
    > On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:08:19PM -0600, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > > On 5 Feb 2001, at 20:17, Robin Faichney wrote:
    > >
    > > > I did not say we are free only to do some things, or only to some
    > > > extent -- that is so obvious as to be needless to say. What I said
    > > > was, we are free only in some senses.
    > > >
    > > Well, obviously some of us are free enough to choose to consider
    > > themselves unfree, or was that complex web of neuronal dynamism
    > > forever set at the instant of the Big Bang, too?
    >
    > Do you think "we are free only in some senses" means "we are unfree"?
    >
    > If you don't understand what I'm saying, why not just say so, and ask
    > for clarification?
    >

    Joe is not capable of that. If he does not understand or he misinterprets
    (often!) then he switches to negative mode. It is a defence mechanism.
    Forgive him, he knows not what he does :-)
    If he did as you suggested then there is the horrifying recognition that he
    FAILED to understand something. shock horror; no no no .. the fault MUST be
    yours... :-)

    Chris.
    ------------------
    Chris Lofting
    websites:
    http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
    List Owner: http://www.egroups.com/group/semiosis

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 10:41:28 GMT