Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Bill Spight (bspight@pacbell.net)
Date: Mon Feb 05 2001 - 18:21:46 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA09203 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:59:17 GMT
    Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 10:21:46 -0800
    From: Bill Spight <bspight@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Message-id: <3A7EEF3A.4CC798F7@pacbell.net>
    Organization: Saybrook Graduate School
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Yahoo;YIP052400}  (Win95; U)
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    X-Accept-Language: en
    References: "2001 at 12:46:45PM -0000" <"3A7E89B0.28777.2C98F6"@localhost>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Dear Joe,

    > memetic evolution being
    > any more robust than genetic evolution (and it must be, to
    > supercede it)

    Clarification, please. :-) What do you mean by "robust"? And how do you
    think memetic evolution supercedes genetic evolution?

    Many thanks,

    Bill

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 05 2001 - 19:01:13 GMT