Re: Labels for memes

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Thu Feb 01 2001 - 12:56:24 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Labels for memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA25484 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:00:44 GMT
    Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:56:24 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Labels for memes
    Message-ID: <20010201125624.B487@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C26@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C26@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:53:07AM -0000
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:53:07AM -0000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > >> All sorts of processes both external and internal go into
    > audience
    > > >> decoding of media content, so much so that I just don't see how what
    > > >> apparently exists in one mind can appear in another mind (let alone
    > > millions
    > > >> of others) in exactly the same form as in the original mind.
    > >
    > <But I don't think anyone is saying it's in exactly the same form.>
    >
    > Ok, but this is one of the problems I have with the meme in mind
    > idea, as I'm not sure how the meme in mind is actually seen.
    >
    > The notion of the meme involves, as far as I understand it, a
    > particular configuration of information that induces it to be expressed (by
    > the person it originates in) and then imitated by people exposed to its
    > expression. But in order for it to be then passed on to others from those
    > first infected people, surely the configuration must be retained in order
    > for it to induce expression in those people, and then imitation in others,
    > and so on?
    >
    > We're talking about a particular kind of information that induces
    > particular kinds of behaviours, surely there must be some consistency of
    > form or pattern in order for it to be transmissable across many generations
    > of hosts?

    Some consistency, yes. But where's the problem with that?

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 13:02:40 GMT