RE: Labels for memes

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 00:02:25 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Mirror neurons"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA27343 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:59:01 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:02:25 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: Labels for memes
    Message-ID: <3A79A4B1.27886.A2B5A6@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C26@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 1 Feb 2001, at 11:53, Vincent Campbell wrote:

    > >> All sorts of processes both external and internal go into
    > audience
    > > >> decoding of media content, so much so that I just don't see how
    > > >> what apparently exists in one mind can appear in another mind
    > > >> (let alone
    > > millions
    > > >> of others) in exactly the same form as in the original mind.
    > >
    > <But I don't think anyone is saying it's in exactly the same form.>
    >
    > Ok, but this is one of the problems I have with the meme in mind
    > idea, as I'm not sure how the meme in mind is actually seen.
    >
    > The notion of the meme involves, as far as I understand it, a
    > particular configuration of information that induces it to be
    > expressed (by the person it originates in) and then imitated by people
    > exposed to its expression. But in order for it to be then passed on
    > to others from those first infected people, surely the configuration
    > must be retained in order for it to induce expression in those people,
    > and then imitation in others, and so on?
    >
    > We're talking about a particular kind of information that induces
    > particular kinds of behaviours, surely there must be some consistency
    > of form or pattern in order for it to be transmissable across many
    > generations of hosts?
    >
    > Vincent
    >
    transmitted ideas mean something a bit different for the recipients
    than they do for the transmitters because the context to which they
    must relate themselves - the existing gestalt - differs some for each
    brain. They are similar enough to allow for behavior to be to some
    degree reproduced due to the fact that we share certain ground
    conditions - perception, symbolicity, our somatic existence among
    others upon a common earth, and so on.
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 02 2001 - 00:00:57 GMT