Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA22864 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:03:14 GMT Subject: Re: Labels for memes Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:00:35 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010131225847.AAA4773@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.180]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi William Benzon --
>Have there been any cases of memetic rebellion where such deliberately
>engineered memes decide to turn on their masters? If so, what? If not,
>what tricks do memetic engineers use to keep their memes in line?
Ya know, it's a horrible, horrible, thing, that the term 'memetic
engineering' gets bandied about at all.
But, in some small effort to squash it for ever and always, and to
simplify the concept by returning it to the realm of 'persuasion' that it
belongs in, let us not forget New Coke.
Or the Edsel.
Frankenstein Monsters, both of 'em.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 23:05:14 GMT