Re: Labels for memes

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:05:14 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Labels for memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA21844 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:50:22 GMT
    Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:05:14 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Labels for memes
    Message-ID: <20010131150514.C11570@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C1F@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C1F@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:42:09PM -0000
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:42:09PM -0000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > <The information has to exist, but not the meme. The meme stays
    > right in the
    > > head of the ad exec for Budweiser. He pays someone to do a TV commercial,
    > > it
    > > gets broadcast, information gets transmitted, and suddenly a million new
    > > copies of the "Wazzuuuuup?" meme get created in new minds.>
    > >
    > Sorry to butt in, but this is an interesting discussion. I like the
    > phrase here 'suddenly a million new copies...'. The million dollar
    > question, though is 'how?' One problem with such examples is that they
    > ignore the many models of the mass communication process...

    Sorry Vincent, but while I sympathise that we might be ignoring your
    expertise, I don't see that anything you say here impacts the main
    issue: the informational nature of the meme and its transmission.
    If we can agree on that, then we can address the complexities of mass
    communications.

    > <Not all memes are behaviors, for example the classic "belief in
    > God." >
    >
    > Well, views on this one have been fully expressed before. IMHO
    > 'God' is a meme, belief in him/her/it is not.

    I don't know. I think that could be considered communicable behaviour.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 18:59:32 GMT