RE: Labels for memes

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 12:42:09 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: apologies from the mouthy englishman"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA20165 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:43:12 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C1F@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Labels for memes
    Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:42:09 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <The information has to exist, but not the meme. The meme stays
    right in the
    > head of the ad exec for Budweiser. He pays someone to do a TV commercial,
    > it
    > gets broadcast, information gets transmitted, and suddenly a million new
    > copies of the "Wazzuuuuup?" meme get created in new minds.>
    >
            Sorry to butt in, but this is an interesting discussion. I like the
    phrase here 'suddenly a million new copies...'. The million dollar
    question, though is 'how?' One problem with such examples is that they
    ignore the many models of the mass communication process. The information
    transmission one, a la Shannon & Weaver, is one of the oldest, yet also one
    of the most problematic. The ad exec doesn't want people going around
    saying 'wassuuppp', the meme he or she wants to transmit is 'drink Bud',
    but whatever the intent, reception doesn't automatically follow- the two
    things don't automatically go together (and neither does people going wasup
    and buying Bud).

            One of the reasons this is the case is because the information
    transmission model is problematised by the complicated nature of mass
    communication, not least that the information changes from whatever's in
    someone's head to some form of encoded expression in print, or on screen, or
    in audio. The fact that the medium of information transmission changes the
    nature of the information being conveyed is a basic point, but an important
    one.

            <Not all memes are behaviors, for example the classic "belief in
    God." >

            Well, views on this one have been fully expressed before. IMHO
    'God' is a meme, belief in him/her/it is not.

            Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 12:45:03 GMT