Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA16118 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:35:05 GMT Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:10:03 +0000 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: Labels for memes Message-ID: <20010130131003.A1552@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <20010129142028.B2501@reborntechnology.co.uk> <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBGEGKCDAA.richard@brodietech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBGEGKCDAA.richard@brodietech.com>; from richard@brodietech.com on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:30:59PM -0800 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:30:59PM -0800, Richard Brodie wrote:
> No one doubts that one phase of the meme's existence is behavioral, just as
> one phase of the gene's existence is phenotypic.
How can you say "one phase of the gene's existence is phenotypic"?
What does this mean? I don't know of any genetic phase other than
"encoded in DNA."
> But an animal is not a gene
> and a behavior is not a meme.
Animals _carry_ genes. Patterns of behaviour _are_ one phase of memes,
just as pupae _are_ one phase of butterflies. How else could memes get
from brain to brain? Telepathy?
-- Robin Faichney robin@reborntechnology.co.uk=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 14:37:09 GMT