Re: Labels for memes

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 14:20:28 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: mirror neurons & memes?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA13655 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:37:42 GMT
    Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:20:28 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Labels for memes
    Message-ID: <20010129142028.B2501@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20010128094520.B566@reborntechnology.co.uk> <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBAEFICDAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBAEFICDAA.richard@brodietech.com>; from richard@brodietech.com on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:40:21AM -0800
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:40:21AM -0800, Richard Brodie wrote:
    > On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 11:53:16PM -0800, Richard Brodie wrote:
    > > > memes in the head (sometimes called L-memes
    > > If, as it appears, the word "meme" must be muddied to include replicators
    > > other than mental information, and distinctions must be drawn (as they
    > > should be) among different kinds of cultural replicators, perhaps "D-meme"
    > > would be a better label for mental replicators, since Dawkins first
    > > published that definition for meme in The Extended Phenotype and Dennett
    > > elaborated on it beautifully in Darwin's Dangerous Idea.
    >
    > Hi Richard. I think I told you before, but you may have forgotten,
    > in Consciousness Explained Dennett says explicitly that one phase of
    > the meme's existence is external to the mind/brain, in behaviour.
    > Of course, Dawkins was amiguous about this in The Selfish Gene, as
    > well. I'd say these waters _are_ muddy, already!
    >
    > Yes, they both clarified their earlier thoughts in later works. Remember
    > this is solely an issue of the definition of one word, not an argument over
    > the memetics model. In any case, it seems fitting to name things after the
    > people who invented them.

    I don't have time to reread Darwin's Dangerous Idea just now, so would
    you mind citing where Dennett retracts his earlier view that one phase
    of the meme's existence is behavioural?

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 29 2001 - 18:39:48 GMT