Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA05408 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:05:36 GMT Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C0E@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: mirror neurons & memes? Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:04:30 -0000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> > >From the tone of these pieces, maybe internalist memetics has its
> smoking
> >> gun after all...
>
<I don't think so! OK, so I haven't read it yet, but from what you
say
> here they're talking about empathy/imitation, which we already know
> has to be innate for _any_ form of memetics to work. There's a world
> of difference between identifying a neural mechanism for imitation,
> and identifying the neural representation of a particular imitated item.>
>
Yes these piece do talk about empathy and imitation, so you may be
right.
But their findings apparently suggest that the firing of these
neurons is very specific indeed in relation to specific behaviours, with
even very similar behaviours stimulating different sets of neurons.
Vincent
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 26 2001 - 15:07:27 GMT