RE: Memes and emotions

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:59:19 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: mirror neurons & memes?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA05371 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:00:26 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C0D@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Memes and emotions
    Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 14:59:19 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Chris,

    Can you do us a favour, and snip in a bit of the previous post you're
    replying to each time you post, as these threads get very confusing
    sometimes.

    Cheers.

    > ----------
    > From: Chris Taylor
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 12:01 pm
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: Memes and emotions
    >
    > It's the old view of the world (started with the Greeks and only really
    > got altered
    > by the Enlightenment-era French biologists such as Cuvier: There is a
    > hierarchy with
    > slime at the bottom and angels in heaven at the top; we come just below
    > angels (these
    > were religious people - angels exist [no joke!], and are better than
    > mortals), then
    > (roughly) animals, plants, mould and finally dirt (officially dead). This
    > is the
    > classic linearised classification system as adopted from the Greeks by
    > Christianity.
    > Linnaeus and Cuvier were instrumental in moving towards a more realistic
    > branched
    > 'Tree of life', on the way to a modern view.
    >
    > I (flippantly) used the image because it assisted in the point I was
    > trying to make
    > that memes only work well in us (recombining parts of ideas), the next
    > link down the
    > great chain is where they can imitate well but not 'think' as we do, then
    > you get
    > down to individual learners who do not share experience (paralelling the
    > argument
    > about asexual clonal reproduction being far inferior to sexual), and
    > finally the
    > hard-wired often non-neural behaviour of simple organisms.
    >
    > Gotta go to a meeting - hope that covers it all!
    > Chris.
    >
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > Chris Taylor (chris@bioinf.man.ac.uk)
    > http://bioinf.man.ac.uk/ »people»chris
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 26 2001 - 15:02:16 GMT