RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:18:04 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA27473 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:19:33 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745BE3@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:18:04 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <...There can be no such thing as an
    > absolutely isolated meaning.>
    >
            Sorry to strip out your other comments (which I take on board and
    concur with). I see there are also quite a lot of posts so I don't want to
    say too much in case I reproduce someone else's comments.

            I guess maybe I'm taking a pedantic line, since this I absolutely
    agree with the sentence above, but what I was questioning whether you could
    call something 'information', without a context to give it meaning. It was
    in that sense that I felt talking about meaningful information might be
    tautological.

            <Actually, the fact that memes must both reside in minds and pass
    > between them stands whether or not you accept the definition of
    > meaningful information, although it is hard to see how
    > meaninglessness could propagate.>
    >
            The effects of memes must include effects on people's minds, but
    that doesn't mean they reside/inhabit people's minds. The question of
    meaningless propagation is interesting because, of course, from certain
    perspectives meaningless things do propagate e.g. wearing baseball caps back
    to front. Also the issue of signification rises in such cases- for those
    people who started wearing their baseball hats back to front, what triggered
    it? and what caused others to follow whoever initiated it?

            So, the question is, signification, or meaningfulness is fine, but
    what shapes the things that become meaningful at any given time, or in other
    words, what turns an idea or piece of information into a 'meme'?

    Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:22:02 GMT