Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA20371 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:42:36 GMT Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia? Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:39:29 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010116143750.AAA13645@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.170]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Robin Faichney --
>neural memes have no way to get from one
>brain to another, just as behavioural ones have no way of being stored
>between instances of the behaviour
I'm still concerned, vis a vis genetic/memetic analogs, that sex ain't
been analogued memetically as well, because, well, dammit, that _is_ the
genetic passage. What is sexual to memetics?
The memetic analog of sex is "some sort of communication", granted, but,
perhaps we need to look at communication a bit more closely, with a bit
more of a genetic component, with a bit more of a basic, autonomic,
functioning of why and how we communicate and what gets communicated.
Not that a lot of us aren't doing this, but, in the effort to consiliate,
I think more should be done memetically to define where and what
communication _is_. What is birdsong to us or us to birdsong?
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:44:09 GMT