RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:54:30 GMT

  • Next message: Mark Mills: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA20607 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:55:50 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745BD8@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:54:30 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <I'm still concerned, vis a vis genetic/memetic analogs, that sex
    ain't
    > been analogued memetically as well, because, well, dammit, that _is_ the
    > genetic passage. What is sexual to memetics?
    >
    > The memetic analog of sex is "some sort of communication", granted, but,
    > perhaps we need to look at communication a bit more closely, with a bit
    > more of a genetic component, with a bit more of a basic, autonomic,
    > functioning of why and how we communicate and what gets communicated.
    >
    > Not that a lot of us aren't doing this, but, in the effort to consiliate,
    > I think more should be done memetically to define where and what
    > communication _is_. What is birdsong to us or us to birdsong?>
    >
    > As the advert says, true... true...
    >
    Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:57:25 GMT