culture and memetics

From: William Benzon (bbenzon@mindspring.com)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 16:56:23 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA17551 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:59:07 GMT
    User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513)
    Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:56:23 -0500
    Subject: culture and memetics
    From: William Benzon <bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Message-ID: <B6888484.6960%bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745BCD@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    on 1/15/01 9:30 AM, Vincent Campbell at v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk wrote:

    > <Look, I'm not saying accept this old stuff hook line and sinker.
    > But I do
    >> think there's work of value, more in psychoanalysis than in Jung. And,
    >> just
    >> as there are thinkers who have rejected psychoanalysis, so there are
    >> thinkers who, for the last 30 years, have been working to reconstruct
    >> psychoanalytic ideas on more modern intellectual foundations derived from
    >> ethology, cognitive psychology, systems theory, and the neurosciences.>
    >>
    > Isn't memetics an effort to do the same for cultural studies?

    Well, if by cultural studies you mean the body of work that's been done
    under that specific rubric for 20 years, no, memeticists don't even know
    about that work.

    The people who are trying to reconstruct psychoanalysis are familiar with
    the ideas. My basic point about memetics is that it seems to be
    substantially ignorant of other ways of studying culture. So it's not
    trying to reconstruct anything; it's trying to do it all over again, from
    the beginnning.

    However, the most important single characteristic of memetics, even what I
    am (contentiously) calling orthodox memetics, is that it views culture as a
    separate domain of objects and processes. It is not just another facet of
    biology. Culture has "slipped the genetic leash," to use a phrase I
    associate with Blackmore. Old-style sociogiology tried to yoke culture to
    the genes, and I think that evolutionary psychology is, in effect, trying to
    do that as well.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 17:00:40 GMT