Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Jan 14 2001 - 10:44:11 GMT

  • Next message: William Benzon: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA13357 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:41:04 GMT
    Message-Id: <200101141043.FAA15364@mail1.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 04:44:11 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    In-reply-to: <20010114094439.A1292@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <200101130456.XAA27096@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:02:32PM -0600
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Date sent: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:44:39 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:02:32PM -0600, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:29:58PM -0000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > Physicists today aren't giants, for the most part standing on Einstein's
    > > > > shoulders, biologists (and all variations thereof) are standing on Darwin's
    > > > > shoulders, psychologists (many rather reluctantly) on Freud's shoulders etc.
    > > > > etc.
    > > >
    > > > Tell that to a gathering of academic psychologists and they'll string
    > > > you up from the nearest lamppost, Vincent.
    > > >
    > > Many psychoanalysts still follow one of the biggies or other (Freud,
    > > Jung, Adler, Erickson, Rogers, Maslow, Laing, May, Fromm, etc.),
    > > or even the behaviorist model (Watson, Skinner, etc.) but there
    > > have been a few revolutions in psychology since those days, for
    > > instance cognitive psychology and evolutionary psychology.
    >
    > No, not merely "revolutions since those days". I studied in a
    > predominantly experimentally-oriented department, and most people there
    > would tell you Freud no played no part whatsoever in the intellectual
    > history of their discipline. I never heard his name mentioned -- nor
    > any other name in that list besides Rogers and Maslow, and they were
    > merely mentioned in passing -- until, in my last year, I fell in with
    > the "black sheep" of the department and was assigned an essay on Freud.
    > Of course, psychoanalysis and contemporary academic psychology are very,
    > very different beasts. And no self-professed psychoanalyst will have
    > anything whatsoever to do with behaviourism, nor vice versa. These are,
    > in effect, different disciplines, rather than different developmental
    > stages of one discipline.
    >
    The behaviorist-influenced psychiatrists and psychoanalysts (and
    they are a distinct minority) mainly embrace either SPC (self-
    programmed control) where the patient is both the conditioner and
    the conditionee, or some pop "get off your lazy ass and do it",
    derivation of Glasser's Control Theory, although a few are influence
    by Albert Bandura's social psych. My ex-wife is a counseling
    psychologist (which is totally unlike experimental or clinical
    psych), and she considered herself a Rogerian. And we haven't
    even mentioned developmental psych. yet (although it is the
    diachronic wing of cognitive psych), where Piaget and his progeny
    still hold sway, although the evolutionary psychs are beginning to
    leaven that ontogeny with a little phylogeny.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 14 2001 - 10:42:34 GMT