Re: Self-defense

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Fri Dec 15 2000 - 18:43:45 GMT

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: Roger Ebert"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA03725 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 15 Dec 2000 18:53:03 GMT
    Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 18:43:45 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Self-defense
    Message-ID: <20001215184345.C524@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20001214210529.AAA11505@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
    In-Reply-To: <20001214210529.AAA11505@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:06:35PM -0500
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:06:35PM -0500, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > On 12/14/00 14:35, Robin Faichney said this-
    >
    > >You say the self evolved. I say it didn't.
    >
    > And I would say that the evidence is against you.

    I'm sure you would. But what I find more interesting is why you insist
    that I'm necessarily making divine distinctions. Because that looks like
    sheer silliness to me. Are you going to defend the claim, retract it,
    or ignore the issue in the hope it will go away? Let me guess...

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 18:58:02 GMT