Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA06306 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 16 Dec 2000 22:54:57 GMT Subject: Re: Self-defense Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 17:51:43 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20001216225002.AAA13562@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.104]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Robin Faichney --
>But what I find more interesting is why you insist
>that I'm necessarily making divine distinctions.
Because I can't for the life of me see where within the material universe
you think this 'no-self' has come....
And I equate all contentions of the supernatural with the divine.
And you don't (am I wrong about this) contend that no-one is born without
it, but that, after periods of specialized training, one can nevertheless
'lose' it, this self thingee....
Or is it perhaps that what you don't call the self is the same thing I do
call it?
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 16 2000 - 22:56:22 GMT