RE: addendum to mysticism etc.

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 13 2000 - 11:59:40 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: religion/spirituality"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA04569 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:01:52 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745B02@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: addendum to mysticism etc.
    Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:59:40 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >> I don't individual philanthropy makes much difference, I think
    society
    >>needs
    >> to address these issues collectively by recognising the
    impoverished as
    >> victims of the social system, whihc is all our responsibility,
    not of
    >> personal failings.

    >How might society do this?

    Very good question, not easy to answer. I suppose examples might be
    pollution, or global warming. Individuals can do some things to try and
    slow the progress of global warming, by recycling, using unleaded petrol,
    using low energy lightbulbs etc. etc. But unless countries start regulating
    fossill fuel industries, unless govemments start making serious regulatory
    efforts to control greenhous gases, for which they need mass public support,
    little is going to change due to the actions of a few individuals.

    >> The USA is an excellent example where the individualist meme
    continues to
    >> work despite the evident barriers to personal development for
    people who
    >> aren't white, male and straight.

    >What are these barriers?

    Put broadly the barriers are such things as racism, sexism and other forms
    of prejudice. Put more specifically, it's things like inequity in terms of
    wages (women earn less than men for the same work), differential treatment
    in other situations, e.g. african americans more likely to get jail terms
    and longer sentences that whites for the same crimes. The US health system
    is geared up against the low waged, as is the education system and the
    political system. The world's greatest democracy, took some 180 years or so
    to get a catholic president, and has never had a non-white, non-male
    president. Even countries as gender-biased as Pakistan and the UK have had
    female political leaders. Of course the biggest barrier to political office
    in the US is money. If you don't have money you can't be a politician-
    certainly not at the federal level anyway.

    Don't get me wrong, a lot of these barriers, and more, exist in other
    nations, but they are substantial and they do impact on an individual's
    chances of success (however one defines it).

    Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 13 2000 - 12:03:19 GMT