Re: What is Meaning

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2000 - 09:17:38 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Tests show a human side to chimps"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA25833 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:26:55 GMT
    Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:17:38 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: What is Meaning
    Message-ID: <20001110091738.A1094@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20001109133230.AAA9926@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> <Pine.BSO.4.21.0011091209110.19346-200000@shellac.militant.org>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
    In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0011091209110.19346-200000@shellac.militant.org>; from nathan@militant.org on Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 12:56:19PM -0800
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 12:56:19PM -0800, Nathan wrote:
    > Greetings everyone, I've been reading the list for some time, but this is
    > my first posting to it.

    Hi Nathan -

    There's a lot can be said about meaning. I like Wittgenstein's
    formulation, whereby the meaning of a word or phrase etc is its use in a
    particular context. If you know how to use it, you know what it means,
    otherwise not. This is simple and it covers the ground. It also happens
    to tie in with a "deeper", more technical philosophical/psychological
    perspective, viewing meaning as a particular form of encoding of
    information.

    <snip>

    > I see the process of belief as a process of self-deceptoin.
    > Basically it's a vehicle by which ideas can gain control over
    > people's minds and therefore their lives. Beliefs dictate precise
    > parameters of people's conciousness of their behavior and
    > perceptoins. A belief paints the world in its own image.
    >
    > - Barry Alfonso, from an interview in Re/Search #11 - Pranks

    This is exactly how I see it. To believe in something is to give that
    meme the upper hand. All we need at most are "working hypotheses", which
    are held only as long as, and to the extent that, they continue to work.
    That is, memes under control. But we have to monitor that all the time.
    The price of freedom from memetic domination is constant vigilance!

    This Barry Alfonso seems an interesting chap. I can feel a web search
    coming on...

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 10 2000 - 09:28:12 GMT