Re: was: the conscious universe

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:31:15 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: mysticism" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA01189 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:38:31 +0100
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:31:15 +0100
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Subject: Re: was: the conscious universe
Message-ID: <20001005133115.A1584@reborntechnology.co.uk>
References: <20001004172346.C10495@reborntechnology.co.uk> <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745A6B@inchna.stir.ac.uk> <20001004172346.C10495@reborntechnology.co.uk> <200010041702.SAA18579@mail.staffs.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200010041702.SAA18579@mail.staffs.ac.uk>; from k.reiling@staffs.ac.uk on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:04:59PM +0100
From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:04:59PM +0100, Dr Kevin Reiling wrote:
    >
    > > Only in philosophy does a rank outsider think he's perfectly entitled
    > > to stand up and spout off without having bothered to take one class or
    > > read one book -- or one paper -- in the relevant area.
    >
    > Nope, try evolutionary biology it may be worse.

    I find that difficult to believe, but I'll take your word that it's bad,
    and I sympathise. 

    -- 
Robin Faichney

    ===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:40:37 BST