Re: the conscious universe

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Thu Oct 05 2000 - 00:40:17 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "RE: acronymious"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA03056 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Oct 2000 00:37:59 +0100
    Message-Id: <200010042339.TAA21456@mail1.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:40:17 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: the conscious universe
    In-reply-to: <20001004172346.C10495@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745A6B@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:55:04PM +0100
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Date sent: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:23:46 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: the conscious universe
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:55:04PM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > > Consciousness resides, as I think Joe
    > > has already said, in the neurological tissue of the body, principally, but
    > > not necessarily exclusively in the brain.
    >
    > Only in philosophy does a rank outsider think he's perfectly entitled
    > to stand up and spout off without having bothered to take one class or
    > read one book -- or one paper -- in the relevant area.
    >
    I hope that this is not directed at me, Robin; I HAVE taken
    graduate level classes in biological psychology and HAVE
    extensively read in the field.
    >
    > I just wrote a couple of paragraphs, then deleted them. I'm tired of
    > this. If you're so keen to stick with your current views, why should I
    > bother?
    >
    > My last word on this subject: IF you're really interested in consciousness
    > for its own sake, rather than just as a tool to bash what you view as
    > non-rationality, then get Max Velmans' book Understanding Consciousness.
    > His views are not as close to mine as I first thought, but I agree with
    > the quote on the cover saying it is "an exceptionally lucid and balanced
    > account of the different approaches to and aspects of the problem".
    > (Prof Jeffrey Gray, Institute of Psychiatry, London) In particular, he
    > appreciates that subjective phenomena cannot be investigated objectively.
    > And, of course, only objective phenomena can be located in time and space.
    > When you've read that, or, for that matter, any other recent book in
    > the same area, I'll be interested to hear what you think about it.
    >
    Actually, we can, through PET scans and fMRI's, directly correlate
    with a high degree of statistical assurance changes in levels of
    activity in specific areas of the brain with specific subjective
    perceptions, thoughts and action-initiations, Such studies have
    been done for some years now, and continue to hone in on more
    precise differentiations.
    >
    > > >I just coined a new internet acronym, to join the ranks of BTW,
    > > IIRC
    > > >and RTFM -- DBFS. See if you can guess what it means. (Hint: it
    > > has
    > > >more in common with RTFM than the fact they're both FLA's (four
    > > letter
    > > >acronyms).)
    > >
    > > It's quite interesting that someone who on pain of death avoids
    > > clarification or adequate definition of terms they use in wildly different
    > > ways from established understanding of those terms, is able to find time to
    > > make up abusive internet acronyms. It's a mark of intellectual and
    > > psychological inadequacy and insecurity.
    >
    > That paragraph is more seriously abusive than anything I've written.
    > I don't know why you felt it appropriate to react that way, and I'm not
    > going to speculate. Bye for now.
    >
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 00:39:15 BST