RE: mysticism

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed Oct 04 2000 - 19:32:49 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: the conscious universe"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA02494 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:35:52 +0100
    Subject: RE: mysticism
    Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:32:49 -0400
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20001004183252.AAA14748@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 10/04/00 10:17, Gatherer, D. (Derek) said this-

    >"No [allegedly seeing person] has ever created an instrument [technology]
    >that shows us what they 'see'. Although they've supplied us with a myriad
    >of stories and fables and yarns."
    >
    >So are we out of the problem yet?

    Well, to put this problem away, since it really weren't a problem, for
    me, in the first place, we can, as sighted people, create a machine that
    reacts to light and supplies a pinch, or a poke, or even some pleasant
    input to the sense of touch, say, in the same way a photocell circuit can
    move a needle.

    In essence, we can 'change' the sensory input, as long as we can sense
    the original with some instrumentation, and so far, we have not been able
    to supply a human sense that some instrumentation cannot also duplicate,
    and in most cases, greatly surpass.

    >* I think this may actually not be strictly correct, as brain stimulation by
    >magnetic fields can recreate mystical experiences (as indeed can certain
    >drugs) - so maybe there is a technology of mysticism....

    I would not call this a technology of mystics at all, quite the contrary,
    unless mystical knowledge was necessary to make this machine that uses
    stimulating magnetic fields. Much more the case, I see this as a real
    universe explanation of mystical experience, providing us with empirical
    proof that such experiences are totally subjective.

    There is no technology of mysticism, just as there is no technology of
    astrology.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 04 2000 - 19:37:10 BST