RE: Purported mystical "knowledge"

From: Chris Lofting (ddiamond@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Thu Oct 05 2000 - 14:23:07 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: was: the conscious universe"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA01100 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:21:22 +0100
    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Purported mystical "knowledge"
    Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:23:07 +1000
    Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIGEJGCJAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    In-Reply-To: <20001005035631.AAA50@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.169]>
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Wade T.Smith
    > Sent: Thursday, 5 October 2000 1:57
    > To: Memetics Discussion List
    > Subject: Re: Purported mystical "knowledge"
    >
    >
    > Hi Brent Silby --
    >
    > >It is hard to imagine a mind with absolutely no memes. It would be a
    > >dull, non-eventful blank space.
    >
    > Or it would be completely free and active in all realms and to every
    > situation, without the prisons and walls of beliefs and society.
    >
    > The world without memes does not seem dull at all to me, just the
    > contrary- it seems edenic.
    >

    Ahh.. this interpretive mode suggests seeking perfection, clarity rather
    than 'interference'... single context thinking... perhaps even the
    'eternal'? In its purest sense this takes you back to the pure gene -- basic
    stimulus/response with ease and simplicity -- very taoist/zen...

    In this particular realm of interpretations there is a 'pure' position and a
    'balanced' position, the latter favouring 'harmony' and so acknowledging
    'others'. The former has no such acknowledgement, in this interpretation
    there is only one context and it is 'mine' and so no recognition of
    'negation' and so 'logic' etc since it is all 'faith', total trust in
    oneself.

    This is a very LOCAL perspective, self-contained with relationships limited
    to associations with likeminded (often at a competative level). An
    attraction to SAMENESS.

    Brent on the other hand seems more attracted to difference, aspectual
    analysis, the hidden, sameness is 'boring'...

    Chris.
    ------------------
    Chris Lofting
    websites:
    http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond

    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:23:27 BST