Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA03718 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Oct 2000 02:25:37 +0100 Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 14:20:55 +1300 From: Brent Silby <phil066@it.canterbury.ac.nz> Subject: Re: Purported mystical "knowledge" To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Message-id: <000a01c02e6a$9ea68c60$25d910ac@oemcomputer> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_3Rw9h4cOVZJjtm8KIGbzkw)" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <20000917100006.C957@reborntechnology.co.uk> <200010050032.UAA20975@mail3.lig.bellsouth.net> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
>A cognitive ecosystem is quite different from the Gaian ecosystem in the sense that mutation and selection for replication are to some degree a function of conscious decision, will, innovation and experimentation. Most memes 'mean' something to people, rather than just blindly being, as are flora and fauna for our planet, and are intentionally rather than randomly modified and selected for and/or against by us on the basis of these meanings, and what they mean to and for us.<
Hello, I am new here and hope that I can offer some useful comments (please forgive me if I have misinterpreted the discussion thread).
When I think about memetic evolution, I go all-the-way with the biological analogy. In my way of thinking, "conscious decision" or "intentionality" are just collections of memes. When memes enter our minds, they will either "fit in" with the memetic environment, or they won't. The ones that don't whither away to nothing. The ones that do sometimes mutate. This mutation might be the result of an encoding error or some accidental blending of ideas. Of course, the mutations might not always yield a successful meme. For every successful meme, there are heaps of unsuccessful ones.
Brent.
______________________
--Brent Silby 2000
[Please Try These Links]
[BasePage]: http://www.geocities.com/brent_silby
[Discussion Archive and Links to ePapers]:
http://www.geocities.com/immortal_thoughts_home
Room 601a
Department of Philosophy
University of Canterbury
Email: b.silby@phil.canterbury.ac.nz
__________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: Joe E. Dees
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Purported mystical "knowledge"
Date sent: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 18:37:17 -0600
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk, memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From: Lloyd Robertson <hawkeye@rongenet.sk.ca>
Subject: Re: Purported mystical "knowledge"
Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> At 10:00 AM 17/09/00 +0100, Robin Faichney wrote:
> >
> >The "non-material reality" consists of information -- though it's very
> >solidly based on matter. Memes are items of information, encoded in
> >both neural and behavioural patterns. When someone observes another's
> >behaviour, the meme travels from behaviour to brain, changing its form
> >from behavioural to neural encoding. When that person subsequently
> >performs the same behaviour, the process is reversed. The uncertainty
> >is that inherent in any en/de/recoding process: the outcome depends not
> >only on what "went into" the carrier, but also what key is used to get
> >it out again.
> >
> Granted that information (defined broadly to include misinformation) is
> "non-material". Granted, as well, that all of this information is solidly
> based on the physical world. If we view this "information" as being made up
> of memes that may have properties of attraction and repulsion with respect
> to other memes. And if this means that various "memeplexes" evolve
> competing for mind-space (perhaps defined by the neural networks of which
> you refer) then, using Dennett's ecosystem analogy, we have another level
> or plane of existance which cannot be Lamarkian because, at the mass level,
> it evolves independently of any "will" the communicative "bags of mostly
> water" hosts may have.
>
Actually, umm, no. A cognitive ecosystem is quite different from
the Gaian ecosystem in the sense that mutation and selection for
replication are to some degree a function of conscious decision,
will, innovation and experimentation. Most memes 'mean'
something to people, rather than just blindly being, as are flora and
fauna for our planet, and are intentionally rather than randomly
modified and selected for and/or against by us on the basis of
these meanings, and what they mean to and for us.
>
> Not that the memeplexes have any will. They merely survive to evolve based
> on the number of minds they have collected algorythmically. Any benefit
> accruing to the holders of those minds is incidental - like the benefit
> cattle have by being protected from wolves. There are plenty of examples,
> however, where successful memeplexes have produced behaviors detremental to
> individual well being.
>
> In summary the gods do exist. But not as discrete thinking entities. They
> exist as "body parts" of certain successful (and an even larger number of
> unsuccessful) memeplexes. Another name for the spiritual world is
> "memeworld" (perhaps we can get Kevin Costner to star in a movie of that
> name). And the varios sects of Buddhism also have places in that world as
> does the secular spirituality of humanism.
>
Well, the philosophy of comparative religion, as opposed to any
religion in particular, has long compared and contrasted faith-based
systems. The gods do not have to exist in and of themselves for
the idea of gods to exist in the minds of human beings; the two are
not identical.
>
> Whattya think?
>
> Lloyd
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 02:27:12 BST